Boudreaux on Hayek

The latest EconTalk is an interview with Don Boudreaux, co-contributor to the blog Cafe Hayek, who provides us with an oral annotated bibliography of Hayek’s work.

Some comments,

  1. Boudreaux notes that he has never read The Pure Theory of Capital “cover to cover.” I don’t know what this implies regarding whether or not he’s read it (maybe he’s read most of it), but I think the fact is that very few people have read Hayek’s 1941 treatise on capital. Early on, Boudreaux recommends Prices and Production, but the fact is that Hayek’s treatment of capital theory undergoes quite a bit of change during the 1930s. I’m not one to speak, really, since I myself still haven’t read The Pure Theory of Capital, but you can capture many of these changes in Hayek’s other work, including Profits, Interest, and Investment. While they prefer not to recommend Hayek’s 1941 tome, if you can stomach the complexity (both in the ideas discussed and in Hayek’s use of language) I do recommend it;
  2. There’s some discussion on a feature of Hayek’s work that I’ve brought attention to on this blog: Hayek’s views on money and banking change. Boudreaux notes that during the 1960s and 1970s Hayek began to gradually accept the role of the market in competitively supplying money. Boudreaux suggests that Hayek was influenced by Vera Smith’s The Rationale of Central Banking, but this book was based on Smith’s dissertation, defended during the 1930s. Why did it take Hayek so long to consider free banking? There were plenty of other scholars who had done some work on the topic, including Mises;
  3. There’s a lot of good discussion on the nuance of Hayek’s thought on political philosophy. This includes clarification of some of the issues in The Road to Serfdom, and some talk on Hayek’s advocacy of certain interventions;
  4. I skipped around after a while, but I didn’t hear much on the concept of spontaneous order. This is unfortunate, since I’ve been wanting to read more of Hayek’s work in that area.

Anyways, it’s an interview worth listening to. Personally, I’d enjoy more of these oral annotated bibliographies.

Related Posts

  • Keynes and Cantillon Effects
    → Gene Callahan (HT Daniel Kuehn). Keynes believed that there are "Cantillon effects." The more general way of saying the same thing is that Keynes believed that money is non-neutral, both in th...
  • Hayek on Keynes
    Steve Horwitz paraphrases Hayek's criticism of Keynes' theory of money, As Hayek points out in his review of the Treatise, what Keynes was doing in that book was trying to tell a Wicksellian story...
  • Hayek, Friedman, and Keynes
    I thought an exchange going on in the comments section to a recent post on the Coordination Problem blog is worth reproducing, especially my latest comment (just as a historical curiosity).  Steve ...
  • Hayek Unclear?
    In a comment to a recent post at Robert Murphy's blog, Nick Rowe writes, I always find Hayek too unclear on these questions to have any confidence of capturing what he is saying. I find this to b...
  • Teaching History of Thought
    Maybe it's because I choose to expose myself to heterodox economics, but it seems to me that non-orthodox economists are often the most vocal advocates of teaching students the history of economic ...
  • http://www.youtube.com/user/Malthus0 Malthus0

    “I skipped around after a while, but I didn’t hear much on the
    concept of spontaneous order. This is unfortunate, since I’ve been
    wanting to read more of Hayek’s work in that area”

    Well you can’t do much better then vol 1, of Law, Legislation and Liberty with regards to that. Particularly chapter 2 – Cosmos and Taxis.

    My bookmarked electronic copy is downloadable here if you want

    https://sites.google.com/site/malthus0splace/home/hayek/political-theory

    • http://economicthought.net/blog JCatalan

      Thank you! I downloaded the LLL PDF; and you’re right, LLL is definitely a book I need to read in the near future.