Tag Archives: Krugman

What Did Krugman Mean?

Was Krugman unambiguous in his recent criticism of Narayana Kocherlakota? Absolutely not. He equated Kocherlakota to Austrian theory, and attempted to debunk the latter with a broad, sweeping criticism of the former. Continue reading

Posted in Current Events | Tagged , , , | 41 Comments

Further Notes on Capital Theory and Unemployment

Austrian capital theory does explain why the consumer-good industry is hit, along with the capital-good industry, during recessionary periods. Furthermore, Austrian business cycle theory is not real business cycle theory – there is a different in causation, while the latter tends to lend itself to the pitfalls of macroeconomic aggregation. Continue reading

Posted in Theory | Tagged , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Unemployment in the Hangover Theory

Krugman argues that Austrian theory doesn’t explain why a fall in production occurs in sectors not directly related to the housing sector. This is untrue. Austrian capital theory explains this perfectly. Continue reading

Posted in Theory | Tagged , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Who is the Utopian?

Who are more utopian, Austrians or Keynesians? Continue reading

Posted in Miscellaneous | Tagged , , , , | 16 Comments

Brief Overview of the Keynesian Liquidity Trap

A brief overview of the Keynesian liquidity trap theory, from John Maynard Keynes, through John Hicks, to Paul Krugman. Continue reading

Posted in Theory | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Structural Unemployment and Business Cycles

High natural unemployment is a product of poor labor policy, and not of markets or the length of recessions. Continue reading

Posted in Theory | Tagged , , , , , , | 14 Comments

Sumner on the General Theory

Had Roosevelt continued with the plan to introduce a fiat regime in the United States, would have Keynes still written The General Theory? Continue reading

Posted in History, Theory | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Sure, Evidence Looks Keynesian If That’s How You Doctor It

In his most recent op-ed, “That ’30s Feeling”, Paul Krugman draws parallels between current calls for austerity and the Germany of the 1930s. This time, factual history is against Krugman’s thesis. Germany’s collapse in the early 1930s was hinged on debt and the inability of their central bank to pay for it. Continue reading

Posted in History | Tagged , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Krugman on Hayek

Krugman believes high interest rates will lead to persistently high unemployment. The Austrians respond. But, ultimately, nobody wins. Continue reading

Posted in Miscellaneous | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

Irrelevance of Fiscal Austerity

Krugman remains bewildered at the G20’s call for fiscal austerity by pointing out that slashing stimulus spending is not bound to have a major impact on debt growth and that such a policy could have long-term harmful side effects. The latter concern is legitimate, at least if you believe that Keynesian countercyclical fiscal policy is the correct prescription for our current recession, but I feel that Krugman leaves out a few key details. Continue reading

Posted in Current Events, Theory | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment